Extended version of the FSE'05 paper Year 2006 Peer-reviewed
Computer Science · Research

DynaMine

Benjamin Livshits Thomas Zimmermann
2006
Publication year
Peer-reviewed
Type

Problem

A great deal of attention has lately been given to addressing software bugs such as errors in operating system drivers or security bugs. However, there are many other lesser known errors specific to individual applications or APIs and these violations of applicationspecific coding rules are responsible for a multitude of errors.

Approach

In this paper we propose DynaMine, a tool that analyzes source code check-ins to find highly correlated method calls as well as common bug fixes in order to automatically discover application-specific coding patterns. Potential patterns discovered through mining are passed to a dynamic analysis tool for validation; finally, the results of dynamic analysis are presented to the user.

Results

The combination of revision history mining and dynamic analysis techniques leveraged in DynaMine proves effective for both discovering new application-specific patterns and for finding errors when applied to very large applications with many man-years of development and debugging effort behind them. We have analyzed Eclipse and jEdit, two widely-used, mature, highly extensible applications consisting of more than 3,600,000 lines of code combined. By mining revision histories, we have discovered 56 previously unknown, highly application-specific patterns. Out of these, 21 were dynamically confirmed as very likely valid patterns and a total of 263 pattern violations were found.

Cite this paper — BibTeX
@Unpublished{livshits06dynamine-ext,
  title = "{DynaMine}: Finding Common Error Patterns by Mining Software Revision Histories",
  author = "Benjamin Livshits and Thomas Zimmermann",
  year = "2006",
  note = "Extended version of the FSE'05 paper",
}
Copied